Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Joanna Garland vs Natalia Siedliska Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Garland vs Siedliska analysis and find out who is favored!
Joanna Garland vs Natalia Siedliska Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Garland 0 - 0 Siedliska
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Garland has won 46.88% of points on their second serve, while Siedliska has won 43.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Garland, in recent form, has won 31.25% of their opponent's second serve points, while Siedliska has won 60.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21.43% and 41.22% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Garland has saved 60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Siedliska has saved 64.1% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Garland has won 65.96% of matches played (W/L 31/ 16), with Siedliska winning 50% (W/L 15/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Garland has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 126/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 19/ 21). Siedliska has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 10/ 7), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Garland has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 28/ 14), where as Siedliska has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 10/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Garland has played against opponents with an average rank of 199.81 while Siedliska has played against players with an average rank of 144.43.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Garland has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Siedliska has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Garland has converted 100% of breakpoint opportunities, and Siedliska has converted 41.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
306
Rank
221
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
691
Rank
487
High
28
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
65% (188-101)
Career Total W/L
57% (251-192)
50% (2-2)
YTD W/L
40% (4-6)
$2,400
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Joanna Garland vs Natalia Siedliska For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Garland VS Siedliska
Sportsbook
Offer
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o |
Stats 
Joanna Garland
Player
Natalia Siedliska
59%
(
66 of
112)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
103)
3
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
46 of
58)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
43%
(
48 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Joanna Garland | Natalia Siedliska |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (2/2) | 40% (4/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 48% (11/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (45/34) | 51% (110/107) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 4 | 12 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 31 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:59:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 25.5 | 59.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (33/65) | 72% (559/775) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (24/33) | 57% (317/559) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (15/32) | 43% (93/216) |
| BPs Won% Total | 100% (1/1) | 41% (46/111) |
| Return Pts W% | 24% (14/58) | 47% (343/724) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 44% (4/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 57% (7/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 43% (7/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Joanna Garland Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Joanna Garland
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Joanna Garland
54%
(
50 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
92
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Darya Astakhova
Player
Joanna Garland
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
98
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Priscilla Hon
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Mio Mushika
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Olivia Gadecki
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Koike
Player
Joanna Garland
68%
(
64 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(10) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Natalia Siedliska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sandugash Kenzhibayeva
Player
Natalia Siedliska
59%
(
64 of
109)
1st Serve %
81%
(
73 of
90)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
49%
(
53 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
104
|
1-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Felitsata Dorofeeva-Rybas
75%
(
69 of
92)
1st Serve %
91%
(
80 of
88)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Federica Urgesi
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ella Haavisto
Player
Natalia Siedliska
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
72%
(
88 of
122)
3
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
2
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
27%
(
10 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
56 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
65 of
122)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Yasmine Wagner
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Sevcikova
Player
Natalia Siedliska
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
Player
Natalia Siedliska
78%
(
76 of
97)
1st Serve %
75%
(
74 of
99)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yifan Sun
Player
Natalia Siedliska
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Natalia Siedliska
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
44
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Tamara Curovic
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Garland Vs Siedliska Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Garland are available here and Siedliska photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
